<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oldest English Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.k-international.com/blog/oldest-english-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.k-international.com/blog/oldest-english-words/</link>
	<description>Searching the World for exclusive language stories everyday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roshi</title>
		<link>http://www.k-international.com/blog/oldest-english-words/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>roshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 20:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglingua.com/?p=456#comment-69</guid>
		<description>this is niche one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is niche one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph ferrara</title>
		<link>http://www.k-international.com/blog/oldest-english-words/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph ferrara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglingua.com/?p=456#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I attended a seminar recently conducted by someone with a master in linguistics.
She speculates that the verb &#039;do&#039; will become obsolete - there are only a handful of languages that utilize an auxilliary verb such as &#039;to do&#039; (icelandic, the celtic languages and possibly a semitic language).
moreover, &#039;any&#039; as well is predicted to be lost and in place of &#039;do&#039; and &#039;any&#039; in the flwg sentence, inflection will be used to ask the same question: You have money?

Words that remain in a language without change are normally pronouns, numbers and body parts which is in line with your opening sentence (I, we, three).

Question: i recently saw at an etymology site that has quizzes stating that &#039;mind your Ps and Qs refers to teachers instructing their students not to forget the usuage of the 2 letters, as opposed to another theory about bartenders using that for pints and quarts of beer.
which is correct?

Thank you
Rferrara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended a seminar recently conducted by someone with a master in linguistics.<br />
She speculates that the verb &#8216;do&#8217; will become obsolete &#8211; there are only a handful of languages that utilize an auxilliary verb such as &#8216;to do&#8217; (icelandic, the celtic languages and possibly a semitic language).<br />
moreover, &#8216;any&#8217; as well is predicted to be lost and in place of &#8216;do&#8217; and &#8216;any&#8217; in the flwg sentence, inflection will be used to ask the same question: You have money?</p>
<p>Words that remain in a language without change are normally pronouns, numbers and body parts which is in line with your opening sentence (I, we, three).</p>
<p>Question: i recently saw at an etymology site that has quizzes stating that &#8216;mind your Ps and Qs refers to teachers instructing their students not to forget the usuage of the 2 letters, as opposed to another theory about bartenders using that for pints and quarts of beer.<br />
which is correct?</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Rferrara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph ferrara</title>
		<link>http://www.k-international.com/blog/oldest-english-words/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph ferrara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloglingua.com/?p=456#comment-67</guid>
		<description>am happy to find this site. any lists on words we expect to lose - and why - over the next 20, 50 and 100 years?

thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am happy to find this site. any lists on words we expect to lose &#8211; and why &#8211; over the next 20, 50 and 100 years?</p>
<p>thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

